Replacing sex is easy. But love?

Sex with a robot? Maybe not yet, but ... - Innovation - MSNBC.com

I want to ask a totally female question. Is it possible to love a robot? Not just sex, but love.... It's easy to get those two things mixed up, but they're two very different things. Sex can be just sex. Love can exist without sex. Love can develop from sex. Sex can be an expression of love. But sex isn't love. Now that that's clear, I want to bring in "the female complication." Women's orgasms can be complicated - to say the least. I'd like to bring in a piano analogy here. From a woman's perspective, there are generally two major kinds of orgasms.
By the way... If you're under 18, ask your parents if it's okay if I give you a bit of Sassy Sonya style Sex Ed 101 before you continue reading. If you're over 18, read on.
There is the sexual intercourse style orgasm sometimes generated by hitting the infamous and illusive G-spot. On the orgasm scale of the piano, hitting this orgasm is like banging on the lower keys.
The second major type is all about clitoral stimulation. That can be equated to hitting the higher keys on a piano.
The goal is to play the entire piano beautifully, which it can be done very well by an amateur. Or it can be done by a true musical genius. When that happens, it's magic. More often than not, that magic can only happen for women when love is involved.
So getting back to the topic at hand about scientists, engineers, and video game builders developing robotic sexual devices to be substitutions for the real thing. There is no doubt they can duplicate hitting the low keys on the piano, the high keys, and an amateur playing a tune. Advances in technology can definitely be good for that, but there's no way any of that stuff can replace a virtuoso creating a piece of music that'll ever take your breath away.